Page 1 of 13 123 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 259
  1. #1
    Member Agus3D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Buenos Aires
    Posts
    249

    [UPDATED .bend]19 Billions of Polygons, not a ridiculous number anymore

    EDIT 3: Now the waiting "copying transformation to the device" is pretty much gone! (it initialized a lot faster now)
    (it seems there is a bug making particle instances transfer slower when they are scaled, so apply the transformation to the mesh (ctrl+a) workaround the problem )

    EDIT 2: Blend File updated and optimized to render TWICE as fast and looks right!
    (not taking into account the BVH building time)

    The BVH building time is considerable for this file in a single frame render with a powerful GPU, so it is not really good file for BENCHMARK.
    But for animation with BVH caching that problem goes away!


    EDIT: Blend File at the bottom of the post

    I wanted to test Cycles performing landscapes, so i setup a quick scene with 54K instances of two tree meshes each one aprox 200K and 150K polygons and four texture maps about 512^2pixels, the blender memory indicator displayed about 200MB and the process window showed about 500MB ram so there is a bunch of memory left to put a lot more. Nice!


    http://www.pasteall.org/pic/show.php?id=28926


    http://www.pasteall.org/pic/show.php?id=28927


    http://www.pasteall.org/pic/show.php?id=28929

    And not that bad in time, in my old CPU Phenom-4 cores they took about 40 minutes in Full HD and 100 samples, but at 40 samples they look quite acceptable.

    A little glow and fog and color correction in the compositor.

    EDIT: Guys thank you very much for the nice responses, i also want to share the credit with you all because if this community of developers and artist wasn't here, my means to do it would be severe reduced

    Here is the blend file for whatever you need: i uploaded in Blendswap and Dropbox:
    UPDATED .blend: (2.62 with BMESH is required otherwise the background is shifted)
    http://www.blendswap.com/blends/land...ng-landscapes/

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/65979653/Ble...ondUpdated.rar

    I would really want to see tested it in your machines, specially in any GPU, would be nice to see the timing!


    EDIT 2: Optimized to render twice as fast, and fixed compo nodes making look it bad!

    -Thansk to @michalis to realize that i forgot to delete the mix shaders i didn't use in the leaves.
    So if you are going to render leaves with translucent shader and if they will be seen far away don't mask them, or mix with any other shader, maintain it simple, and try to set the max transmission setting to 1, the change will not be visually appreciable for this kind of scene and you will get much more speed up!

    - Also i didn't know muted shader actually will BE EVALUATED in the compositor after the F12 render, if you didn't realize that, you were getting a very different result from the original screenshot!
    Lesson learned, after you finish something, delete everything that won't be used in the final release!!
    Last edited by Agus3D; 25-Mar-12 at 04:25.



  2. #2
    Moderator BenDansie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Adelaide, AUS
    Posts
    2,486
    Very nice. I get the feeling Ton would get a special kick out of these and the numbers behind them. Remembering what Blender was limited by when it started and all...



  3. #3
    Member 3pointEdit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    6,570
    Wow they look so nice, like flying over Pandora Can we see a closeup of a tree? Interested to see where the polys go.
    Cheers, David ___________"awesome in space and other places".
    ________Follow me on twitter @3pointedit
    _____________ Check the blog Blender's VSE or Youtube Channel for tutorials.



  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,747
    Woooooooooooow like from Vue can you shoe some screenshots from blender or blend file?



  5. #5
    Member mookie3d's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bialystok, Poland
    Posts
    1,157
    How could you describe viewport navigation performance?



  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    1,883
    Originally Posted by rozmiarek View Post
    How could you describe viewport navigation performance?
    Challenging, perhaps?
    Latest Project: BMW 1 Series
    Recently completed and finished project:
    Aston Martin / Beware Christine / M6



  7. #7
    That looks great :O
    What's on my workbench:
    Electric guitar



  8. #8
    Member guitio2002's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    13
    whoo this is looking fantastic!



  9. #9
    Member Atom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    10,789
    Wow, those are really nice.
    OSX Mac Mini i7 @ 2.6ghz 16Gb Ram (no GPU)
    Windows 7 8Gb, GeForce GTX 660 2Gb Ram AMD Hexcore @ 2.7Ghz.
    Atom's Links Page



  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,598
    Sweet, made my day. It really seems a Vue screenshot.



  11. #11
    Member michalis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Αθήνα
    Posts
    6,021
    Very well done!!!
    The rocky hill works great too.



  12. #12
    Member DingTo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Southern Germany
    Posts
    1,390
    Originally Posted by marcoG_ita View Post
    Sweet, made my day. It really seems a Vue screenshot.
    That's what I thought as well! Seriously, this is stunning!
    Blender developer (Cycles / User Interface)
    Blog -- Blender Podcast -- OpenShading -- BlenderDay -- Blender Network profile



  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    466
    Looks really nice, and I certainly would have expected more render time.
    If the trees hold up at close range, you could make a simple camera fly-in and let it cook at renderfarm.fi.
    Oh, they're even asking for heavy cycles scenes! http://www.renderfarm.fi/blog/prodig...r-renderfarmfi

    What method did you use to distribute the instances?
    My only quick nitpick would be that trees on the skyline clearly point straight from the ground.



  14. #14
    You just dislocated my jaw.



  15. #15
    Member Aaron Symons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    71
    That can't be right; 500MB of RAM used for 19billion polys? Even when I link objects I can get a good 20mil+ or so before I max out my available RAM - 2.3GB - or crash Blender.

    How exactly is the scene setup?

    Very good render though. I had a very similar idea for the Nature Academy contest.



  16. #16
    Member quollism's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    343
    Stunning!



  17. #17
    Member OskO's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    15
    Mindblowing. That's really impressive, buddy.



  18. #18
    Member spailler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    New York , USA
    Posts
    103
    Wow, cool!



  19. #19
    Originally Posted by Aaron Symons View Post
    That can't be right; 500MB of RAM used for 19billion polys? Even when I link objects I can get a good 20mil+ or so before I max out my available RAM - 2.3GB - or crash Blender.

    How exactly is the scene setup?

    Very good render though. I had a very similar idea for the Nature Academy contest.

    That's because the renderer does not deal with 19billion polygons. In fact it does only deal with 350k polys. Instancing means that the renderer needs to load the geometry only once into memory and then just checks 54 times for intersection each time with a different transformation applied.

    Btw @ Agus3D: your images really look awesome



  20. #20
    wow, truly amazing result!
    did you paint the maps for the distribution around the mountains from hand?

    one little criticism: i can spot a some trees growing sideways on the mountain, shouldn't they still grow "up", even on a slope?



Page 1 of 13 123 11 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •