|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
||||
 |
||||
|
Too hard to distinguish by me!
3ds max. Rendered with V-ray. I hope it doesn't mean 3dsMAX is over blender  I just haven't seen a render so photorealistic as this one (although very close yes) made in Blender. I just can't notice anything except in the carpet. Taken from highend3d.org (wikipedia) 
............................................
Where to start in Python Last edited by B3D00; 27-Jul-08 at 06:47. |
||||
|
#1
27-Jul-08, 06:41
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, it is nice but there are companies out there that just do nothing but renderers. If you have the budget you can have the nicer looking render.
There have been a lot of rendering packages that just never really went anywhere. Pixie has looked really cool in the past but I don't know, it has gotten better. I think eventually everyone will wind up in the same place given enough man power, time and white papers -- in regards to renders. Shaders are really your only flexibility here. |
|||
|
#2
27-Jul-08, 07:09
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
You can have the same with indigo, I think
|
|||
|
#3
27-Jul-08, 07:16
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yea, good integration with a nice renderer is definitely top priority for things Blender should get (in my humble opinion). The BI just doesn't cut it, and Indigo and LuxRender aren't at the ease of use or speed that V-ray, PRman, Mental Ray, etc enjoy. Of course they are all developed independently with nice big budgets, but just some improvements on the BI would always be nice.
|
|||
|
#4
27-Jul-08, 07:29
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
VRay and Max is the standard for architectural rendering. VRay is particularly good with interiors. What you don't see on these renders is how efficiently VRay does the job, ie: how quickly it actually renders it.
However, with architectural exteriors, VRay is less impressive. Its hdri abbilities are a bit too limmited imo.
............................................
"old Charlie stole the handle and the train won't stop going - no way to slow down." Jethro Tull - Locomotive Breath www.eb3d.co.za |
||||
|
#5
27-Jul-08, 08:12
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
This was rendered with Vray. Vray is used to render. This was made with 3ds Max. 3ds Max is used to model. So how does one base the quality of a modeling package on the quality of a rendering package? Think about it 
|
||||
|
#6
27-Jul-08, 10:29
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well -- that's not exactly a great example. I can see so many signs that this is CGI it's untrue.
And like others said Vray is a rendering engine, it is not 3d studio max. So can blender compete? You tell me: http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread.php?t=114615 http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread.php?t=96073 http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread.php?t=124193 http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread.php?t=112522 http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread.php?t=89201 Those are just a few of the many examples that can be found on this site.
............................................
'It's like wrestling a pig, both of you end up dirty but the pig enjoys it.' -- Theeth on debating conspiracy theorists. |
||||
|
#7
27-Jul-08, 10:48
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd gotta spend some more time looking at the renders pages...
............................................
Where to start in Python |
||||
|
#8
27-Jul-08, 22:44
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
Meh, with a good modeler and lighter and an all around blender whiz, like his max counterpart in this photo, and also with amazing time on his hands to render with indigo, blender could be every good at this, even better (we can fix the carpet!
)
|
||||
|
#9
28-Jul-08, 22:26
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
well, it's a nice render, but it seems obvious to me it's CGI - it has that grainy not quite full quality GI look to me.
............................................
Everyone wants to be the exception to the rule |
||||
|
#10
28-Jul-08, 22:31
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
luxrender can render that quality of image
|
|||
|
#11
29-Jul-08, 20:21
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
