Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 134

Thread: The new Cycles GPU 2.73 Benchmark

  1. #1
    Member mib2berlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,496

    The new Cycles GPU 2.73 Benchmark

    Hi all, the new benchmark Cycles.
    It is GPU only.
    Benchmark use now 256x256 tiles.
    It is a compromise between rendertime and keep 3 or more GPU busy.
    Please dont upload images, render time and specs only, as stamped.


    Please use official Blender 2.73 only, we can compare performance better if all use the same Blender version.

    I add the 2.72 file here too, please render both files with 2.73.

    Open files, hit F12, write down:
    Be aware of long rendertime on low end GPUs, my GTX 760 need 16 Minutes!
    It should be possible to render the bench on 1 GB GPU.

    OS
    GPU
    Rendertime:

    Sponza: XX:XX.XX
    as stamped.
    2.72 file: XX:XX.XX as stamped.


    sponza_273.jpg

    cycles_bench_272.jpg

    Original file and textures from Marko Dabrovic (Lightwave).
    Adapted for Cycles from Pixal (Greg Zaal), many thanks.
    http://portfolio.gregzaal.com/
    I change some settings, reduce texture size for benchmarking.

    File 1: https://www.dropbox.com/s/22624e4agg...ark.blend?dl=0

    File 2: https://www.dropbox.com/s/w986r1mya7...272.blend?dl=0

    Spreadsheet Libre Office file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ee1glhxme3...h_273.ods?dl=0

    Cheers, mib
    Last edited by mib2berlin; 18-Jan-15 at 12:25.
    OpenSUSE Leap 42.1/64 i5-3570K 16 GB Blender 2.7 Octane 3.03
    GTX 760 4 GB, GTX 670 2 GB Driver 375.26 | Blender for Octane



  2. #2
    Member mib2berlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,496
    My results:
    OpenSUSE 13.2/64
    GTX 760 16:10.01
    GTX 560Ti 448 12:29.51 | The Empire strikes back!
    Both 07:25.29

    Cheers, mib
    OpenSUSE Leap 42.1/64 i5-3570K 16 GB Blender 2.7 Octane 3.03
    GTX 760 4 GB, GTX 670 2 GB Driver 375.26 | Blender for Octane



  3. #3
    I remember Sponza, I group I used years ago for 3dsmax used it as a benchmark back then, late 90's I think it was. Good chice mib. Anyway the results :-

    OS : Win 64
    GPU : 2 x GTX 780 ti SC
    Time : 04:04.15

    ** EDIT

    Sorry, scrub the last results, I had "Auto Tile Size" enabled.I set it to 256x256 and got these results :-

    OS : Win 64
    GPU : 2 x GTX 780 ti SC
    Time : 04:06.77

    Not a massive difference.

    Cheers, Wig
    Last edited by Wig42; 11-Jan-15 at 04:53.



  4. #4
    mib2berlin

    Interesting that the Fermi card is beating the 760 in this one. I have 2 580's doing nothing. Might drop them back in my spare machine jus for comparison.

    Cheers, Wig



  5. #5
    My results:

    OS: W8.1 64Bit
    GPU: 2x GTX 970's @ Stock (Reference models)
    Time: 04:29:61

    GPU: 2x GTX 970's OC @ 1515 MHz
    Time: 04:10:17
    i7 4790k @ 4.8GHz | 16GB RAM | 256GB + 1TB SSD | 2x GTX 970 OC | 28" 4K Disply | Windows 10 Pro | LuxRender



  6. #6
    My results:

    OS: Windows 8.1 / 64bit
    GPU: 2x GTX 780 OC 4:18.64
    Time: 04:18.64

    Time: with even size tiles 200x360 is 04:00:05.

    Mib2berlin why not optimize tile size to fit evenly with the dimensions size? Like in previous benchmarks. It is noticeably faster as you can see above.

    Edit: Corrected the tile size to 200x360.
    Last edited by eklein; 11-Jan-15 at 19:53. Reason: Corrected the even size tile to 200x360.



  7. #7
    My result:

    OS Windows 7 pro 64 bit
    GPU GTX 580 3gb
    Rendertime: 10:41.55
    Last edited by Jholen; 11-Jan-15 at 04:10.



  8. #8
    OS: Windows 7 64bit
    GPU: GTX 780 Ti OC
    Time: 07:24.04
    Portfolio and Blender freebies:
    moe3d.com



  9. #9
    OS: Windows 8.1 64bit
    GPU: GTX 980 Strix
    Time: 07:07.43



  10. #10
    Originally Posted by mib2berlin View Post
    My results:
    OpenSUSE 13.2/64
    GTX 760 16:10.01
    GTX 560Ti 448 12:29.51 | The Empire strikes back!
    Both 07:25.29

    Cheers, mib
    What did you break lol



  11. #11
    Member pitiwazou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,759
    OS: Windows 8.1 64 bits
    GPU: GTX 780 + Geforce Titan
    256x256 > Time: 05:45:96
    400x360 > Time: 05:28:62



  12. #12
    Windows 10 x64
    GTX 970 + GTX 560 Ti
    Time 5:49.22



  13. #13
    Member mib2berlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,496
    Hey, thanks for posting.
    These are interesting results, it seams the 900 and the 500 cards are profit from the scene or latest Cuda development.
    There are not much entries atm. but I post the first results.

    bench_273.jpg

    @LordOdin, Your result is a bit annoying, as fast as 780+TITAN, or the 700 series lost a lot of performance.
    @eklein, tile setting was discussed a lot in the last benchmark thread.
    Absolute result is not important, we only want compare the GPUs.

    Cheers, mib
    OpenSUSE Leap 42.1/64 i5-3570K 16 GB Blender 2.7 Octane 3.03
    GTX 760 4 GB, GTX 670 2 GB Driver 375.26 | Blender for Octane



  14. #14
    Ubuntu 14.04
    GTX 760 - 14:57.36


    CPU comparison:-
    Intel 4930K @ 4.5 GHz
    Tiles 16 x 16 - 17:03.53
    Last edited by organic; 11-Jan-15 at 11:35.



  15. #15
    Member Manolo76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Univers Zro
    Posts
    243
    OS: Windows 7 64bit
    GPU: MSI GTX 780 6 Gb & GTX 580 3Gb
    Time: 05:12.15

    With only GTX 780 : 9:18.79
    With only GTX 580 : 10:50.04



  16. #16
    Member aflocka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    192
    OS: Windows 7 64bit
    GPU: GTX 660 Ti
    Time: 14:56;94
    College films - AwwYeaStudios on Youtube
    Personal YouTube - aflocka on Youtube



  17. #17
    Windows 8.1 x64
    GTX 970
    Time 8:10.57



  18. #18
    Originally Posted by mib2berlin View Post
    Hey, thanks for posting.
    These are interesting results, it seams the 900 and the 500 cards are profit from the scene or latest Cuda development.
    There are not much entries atm. but I post the first results.

    bench_273.jpg

    @LordOdin, Your result is a bit annoying, as fast as 780+TITAN, or the 700 series lost a lot of performance.
    @eklein, tile setting was discussed a lot in the last benchmark thread.
    Absolute result is not important, we only want compare the GPUs.

    Cheers, mib
    If you want to compare GPU only you need scenes that dont take 20+ seconds to build the BVH

    I know a 3960x can build BVH more than double the speed of my FX-8350 (rough tests could be wrong but its deffo faster)



  19. #19
    Win 8.1 pro 64-bit
    MSI 750ti gaming OC (stock)
    time: 16:34.20

    Overclocked @1289/1525
    time: 14:18.93
    Last edited by Crus-T; 11-Jan-15 at 16:01.



  20. #20
    Win 8.1 pro 64-bit
    GTX 690 (otherwise a 5 year old computer: i7 920)
    Time: 07:29.20



Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •