Hi Dave,
thank you very much for your feedback and ideas.
I am familiar with these ideas already, though I see no chance to realize them now.
All my time goes into programing and bug fixing to make the script ready for beta release. I make a great progress but it consumes an incredible much time.
This is also the ground the manual and feature videos are not ready yet and the project homepage is so minimalistic.
Blog-scenario is not realistic: although I am working on my English, it is still not efficient enough for regular reports about my activities and project’s progress - it would take to much time.
In opposite to my previous projects I decided to start an alternative developing model for CADtools, with the hope to get more feedback and financial support from users.
It bases on non-anonymous relations, means i have individual contact to each user.
Registration obstacle is the method to get in contact to people really interested in.
I am all for open source software but found no better method to motivate people to get in contact with me than keeping sources closed and offering binaries only for registered users.
And it works - the feedback is better than for DXF-scripts. The financial part doesn’t work, but i hope it will change with publication of beta version.
I don’t think current Blender community is able to finance CAD extension for Blender (see our efforts for Nurbana integration: link1, link2), because there are too few users really interested in CAD and even they are not in the position to pay much for it (students, hobbyists). The point is to get more professional CAD users on board.
I have contacted Bart at BlenderNations and Allan at Blender3dArchitect already, but asked them not to publicize about CADtools until i have a stable beta. The problem is: beta should have a working UNDO functionality, but Blender’s UNDO function “doesn’t like” some python scripts, mine inclusive. I am trying to figure it out since a long time and I really don’t know how long it will take to fix it.