For the anatomical dudes (Desoto, Kansas_15, Gr8RedShark):
you raise an interesting problem as sexual prestance is often considered as a symbol of power (virulent, vir, virilis, virility, the man and the power, great thoughts ugh?) and is often linked to the BigBadBurningGuy…
But I just don’t like to walk along clichés… so I dropped the idea…
well, I guess it really depends on the myths you’re using.
hehe :] or if you’re ready for a long thread that would end up with religious people against hum… (?) the others (or something else)
I think somebody posted once an image of a demon with a CpEeNnSiOsR ( what was that ? ), and it just got censored, so I’m not going to try that though I really do not have any problem with it.
Further on, I WOULD do him a beastly weapon of sexuality if he was the, erm, brutal kind of demon (you know : all muscles, no brain)… I think this one is more like the smart and cruel type.
BTW, aren’t demons some sort of fallen angels? And angels appear to have no sex… :o
Concerning anatomical exactitude… or realism, again, I’m trying to get away from those… make things beleivable more than physically correct…
Dittohead: Thanks for the comments! Indeed, a lot of people find his nose is weird, out of place… I’m thinking on changing it, but I have this irrational attachement to it: I always (or very often) start modelling from the nose :] so this guy started as a bunch of nose-polys a grew out of that
But, well, only an idiot won’t change his nose (or am I confused?)