this was like christmas, very excited.
seems like non of us saw this coming, but I’m happy for once to have guessed wrong
For this and for the future, we definitely need some sort of CyclesLeaks® site!
Thanks you, I got the branch to build but got errors in Cuda and Optix kernels.
Nice WE for testing.
Daaaaaamn… hype was worth it
yw, I tried building it too, but got infinitely stuck on hpdf_destination.h
Prolly just a one time thing.
Hi, I make a new thread about CyclesX for testing.
I guess there are other Cycles development in the next month, at least I hope so.
cycles is 10 years old
That means I’ve been using blender for 10 years. Wow what a journey.
Guys, I hope you don’t mind that I’ve moved the recent Cycles-X related posts to the new dedicated thread about that. I think Cycles-X deserves its own discussion. Come join us there:
A post was merged into an existing topic: Cycles-X
Hi, Cycles development goes further:
I will check the patch on top of CyclesX, if I can get it to work.
EDIT: Cant get anything meaningful out of it.
Does anyone have a performance regression when using Optix vs CUDA? I was experimenting with 2.93, (we are still on 2.79), testing out both Optix and CUDA, and Optix was around 30-40% slower then CUDA?
I thought reading around that CUDA was supposed to be slower than Optix. Maybe its the scenes we do.
Optix is slower then Cuda if you are using a 10xx graphics card or lower, it needs those RTX GPUs to take advantage of their RT cores / Tensor cores.
Some pretty impressive test with the experimental texture caching branch.