E-Cycles - RTX version 50% off during beta (until 21th of September)

I can confirm there have been many builds since then - including one yesterday!

2 Likes

For the big textures, you can already activate “persistent images” in the performance panel. For the rest, as I said, I’m already working on making it faster :slight_smile:

2 Likes

thanks for pointing that out. It’s indeed time to update those results anyway :slight_smile:

1 Like

Your “ReadMeFirst.txt” instructions for Windows, direct to change the registry.
Like below? Is that the right dword and is 20 a decimal value?

You can type anything above 20 here. I use 60 personally to be sure. It’s just the time after which the driver will restart if the tile takes to much time to render.

Impressive!
32’53" instead of 1h02’42"

Windows 7 pro, i7 GTX 680M laptop, Blender 2.80.

2 Likes

And even more impressive today, thanks to @skw Intel’s OpenImageDenoise’s node is in E-Cycles :slight_smile:
To use it, activate the denoising passes (without the actual denoising) and add a filter-> denoise node in the compositor :

a 12sec render:

Danke schön Stefan :slight_smile:

6 Likes

How many samples was this last? (12sec)

If I buy the full license , will that work for both versions ?
Also , I am using Crowdrender , wonder if its compatible ? Probably is but I would hate to buy it and then it will not work. BTW, Crowdrender allows me to render via network still frames on my other computers, just a bit concerned.

16spp iirc

People buying the 2.7x version automatically get the 2.8x too, was that your question?
E-Cycles is 100% compatible with official Blender as only Cycles performance was changed.
The Intel denoising node and dithered sobol at the moment are only in E-Cycles, but it’s still compatible in both direction.

1 Like

Builds have been updated again with better RTX kernels.

1 Like
  1. If I understand correctly, this node only exists in a separate build to Blender 2.80 master?
  2. And also I don’t see it in your build (ecycles v10 / 2019.02.04), correct?
  3. Is it included in a newer build of yours?

Since when :slight_smile: ??
EDIT :

Yes it is … and WOW !!
Down from 1h2’ , first to 32’ with e-cycles and now with denoise added to 8’48". Freaky
Render image is 2400X2400 (screen shot sized down below)


50 spp (instead of 275 and master build denoiser)
Ok there is an obvious problem that seems to be generated from the light of the glass panels that have a noise surface distortion to look more real close up.
Other than that… WOW

It’s in the “20190207a” build :slight_smile:

Edit: Great it gives good results so fast :slight_smile:


Side by side, detail of the bigger images :
(I have fiddled with the filmic contrast and saturation between the 2 shots. Otherwise same camera, same resolution 2400x2400, same render settings)
Left is the Compositor Denoised Intel render image, <9mins with e-Cycles
Right is the Master Build Denoiser (a render layer option, not a compositor node), 1h2’

Some of the craziness on the wall is also on the metal railing. Other than that, numbers speak for themselves

Tests are welcome :slight_smile:
It looks like the network was trained with some water caustics it now tries to reproduce. Maybe try to increase the spp a bit or to play with the glossy bounces, filter glossy and caustics options. I guess disabling caustics could help a lot here.

Are you using sample clamping? You can try what happens if you uncheck “HDR” in the denoting node, that may or may not improve things.

Bliblubi,

In my investigation and test comparing Sobol with Dithered Sobol. According to original research paper from Arnold Render see blue dithered paper and comments from Stefan Werner see dithered sobol. Their is no reduction of render error noise. The 20 percent reduction in render noise for dithered sobol is not valid.

What dithered sobol is doing is distributing the noise in way that visually looks better. That is only for low render samples and noisy image areas with higher contrast. At higher render samples where the render image has a low amount of noise samples dithered sobol has no benefit.

See attach image comparing Sobol with Dithered Sobol at 300, 600 and 1000 spp from Classroom scene.

2 Likes

Well, as I said, it doesn’t work in all cases and that’s the reason it’s an option, otherwise I would have made it automatic. So it may fails in some benchmark file at high spp but it work in most real cases even without much learning:

What some people say is that the dithered sobol moise distribution, which is kinda more regular, is better for the denoiser to do its job, so less blur splotches, that you can avoid raising the sample count, which raises rendertime. No guarantee, and your mileage may vary a lot

2 Likes