I’ve been using Corona for two days and I can say it’s awesome and incredibly fast. Here you have some test renders I did last week. Everything is modeled in Blender and rendered using Corona in 3DS Max.
Did you try to render it in cycles.
Rendertime?
Nice.
Yeah, corona is good … pretty much as close as it gets to a “Make a pretty picture” button thanks to simple settings and easily achievable realistic lighting.
30 minutes of rendering for a 2k image aprox. I didn’t try to render it in cycles, I have a CPU and it was way slower than Corona
30 min thats long. I think cycles can render the same image in 5 min (or maybe 2 minutes) with gpu, and 10-15 min with cpu?.
Edit: which cpu do you have.
Here I am, looking for some ad of Corona beer…
That is a great looking metal surface.
@Love 3D I think it depeands on what good your CPU or GPU is maby your would render it in less than 15 min but you don’t know specs of his computer so its impossible to say if it would be faster or slower as long as u don’t have any experience in work with corona but then you wouldnt have asked about render time. Huff… Long post. Sorry for hate didn’t mean to offend anyone.
Well I didn’t test it. But Corona is way faster than Cycles and faster that most renderers in the market. Actually I don’t like to say “faster” because that’s relative to the type of scene you are rendering. But on the few tests I’ve done I chose Corona because it was way faster than cycles using my i7 2600k cpu without needing to buy a gpu. Probably a Cycles gpu rendering vs a Corona cpu rendering will result in Cycles being faster. It’s hard to test. It depends on the cpu and the gpu. So everything is kinda relative
Anyway the scene and materials looks good.