# GPL Discussion

**URL:** <https://blenderartists.org/t/gpl-discussion/1115476>\
**Category:** Blender Development Discussion\
**Created:** [June 15, 2018, 6:16pm UTC](https://blenderartists.org/t/gpl-discussion/1115476 "2018-06-15T18:16:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 21

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Romanji](https://blenderartists.org/user_avatar/blenderartists.org/romanji/32/39534_2.png) [@Romanji](https://blenderartists.org/u/Romanji)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2018, 12:17pm UTC](https://blenderartists.org/t/gpl-discussion/1115476/21 "2018-06-18T12:17:06Z")

</div>

> [@The future of blender after 2.8](https://blenderartists.org/t/the-future-of-blender-after-2-8/1114979/22):
>
> Why should Blender be FBX compatible ?

> [@The future of blender after 2.8](https://blenderartists.org/t/the-future-of-blender-after-2-8/1114979/32):
>
> I’m professional

In the context of each other, one of those statement makes no sense.

> [@The future of blender after 2.8](https://blenderartists.org/t/the-future-of-blender-after-2-8/1114979/34):
>
> 10 years from now people are gonna be like, remember autodesk?

Comments like this are the mark of a Blender-fanboy. I hope you are not infected by that disease.  
I don’t like Autodesk the company as much as any other 3D artist with a working brain, but engaging in wishful thinking is still delusional and not really helpful.

---

_[View the full topic](https://blenderartists.org/t/gpl-discussion/1115476)._
