No no no.
replace ‘zodiac creatures’ by “gold ratio” , “stars” by “angles” and “sky” by “picture”
You are stretching it. Astrology has a lot of superstition and mythology attached to it.
The golden ratio is just a mathematical relationship. Astrology may have math in it, but it is not strictly math.
You also said Phi is:
more like , randomly fit between a 1 to 2 ratio instead of the the perfectly 1,618 … but do you even know why that number is magical ? No it’s not because " it’s in the nature everywhere " … coz it’s simply the only value which verifies . 1 + A = 1 / A with A =~ 0,61803398…
Yes I know why the Phi is “golden”. You are not going to change my opinion on it and I probably won’t change yours. I have studied it for a long time and its not an “ordinary” ratio. You can find it in the Fibonacci sequence and you can find the Fibonacci sequence in the Mandelbrot set.
In my opinion the most “revealing” formula which shows how phi relates to 1 is:
Φ = 0.5 ± √1.25
(0.5 + √1.25) multiplied by (0.5 - √1.25) equals 1
They are the only 2 numbers in equal proportion that have a difference of 1 from each other that can also be multiplied together to get 1. Why is 1 so relevant? Down the rabbit hole we go…
For a reality to be “knowable” it has to have dimension and dimension must have a unit of measure.
Build any unit of measure without 1’s if you can…
Try building a computer without using on’s and ones. Its the 1’s that count and hold their place. Zeros cannot hold a place. Example: 0+0=0 …it stays the same and you don’t move along the number line. 1+1=2…it moved. 1 holds its place because its the one number that counts and adds up that all others are built on. You cannot even compose a song without Phi showing up. Most people don’t realize it but it is not possible to make any form of measure without it creating a fractal or self-similar structure over time. The reason why is because the only way for a “unit of measure” to be useful is for it to become “defined” and the only way to “define” a unit of measure is to compare it to another unit of measure like meters to kilometers etc… Proof: I make a new unit of measure call it a quinquinquaginmeter. It isn’t very useful unless I relate or compare it to another “unit” to give you reference on its size and it becomes defined. This is also related to the concept of infinity. Most people think of infinity as some unimaginably large number that can never be reached. This is simply the wrong way to think about it. Infinity can be any size because any unit of measure can never be perfectly defined since all units of measure are based on each other and must continue forever or end with a unit that is based on itself like phi. Infinity is a measurement or mathematical concept which is a value that is not fully definable. Most people don’t realize this. In order to define a unit you must compare it to another unit that must also have some definition. Furthermore you cannot define a word without comparing it to another word, or color or sound or shape or object. Go ahead and try. Since this is true, any form of measurement is dependent on “connection” of 2 or more units. This is why we see branching structure in nature and the reality we live in called the Universe. It is my theory that any object that has a “well defined measure” is dependent on a network-like structure. The internet is like a giant measuring machine of information. We did not invent the network. If there are people that think the internet is the only means of transmission of information in this reality, they have their heads where the moons don’t shine. Look around. Everything is connected for a reason. Objects with measure are dependent on comparisons. Phi is a very interesting comparison because it is a comparison that is based on itself and gives meaning.
This picture below looks like magnetic field lines. Mag-net-ic. A “net” of atoms sharing charge and built on each other “measured” and organized on a “periodic” table. Its called periodic because the charges of elements have similar recurrences at different intervals. I could go on and tell you my theory on magnetism and where that invisible force comes from. Magnetism feels like a cushioned solid force that is invisibly floating in mid air. With this in mind lets ask the question: What is actually truly solid in the Universe? An atom is mostly empty space yet it appears solid at our human scale vantage-point. If all chunks of matter are inside and part of a larger chunk of matter (such as an electron inside an atom) could the force we feel from magnetism be a concentrated interference between an interior chunk of matter bound inside an exterior chunk of matter that appear solid at certain scales like atoms? So the “invisible” force we feel is actually part of a “solid” aspect from a larger chunk of matter that is magnified on our level by the (mag)net? Theory…
The reason the number 8 sideways is used to symbolize infinity may have something to do with this picture or this math:
If you divide 4/5 and iterate you get:
If you kept dividing and adding forever, you would get 1.
I can also make perfect gold ratio figure :
with a rectangle : width = 1 , height = Phi (or the opposite)
or a trapeze : Phi at bottom, 1 above (or the opposite)
or a triangle : 1 for the longest side, Phi -1 for the other side
What I specifically meant was: Geometrically you only need pentagon and its there. With a rectangle you have no way of knowing exactly how long the side should be without using another unit to compare it to.