Icon Viewer 1.3.1

Coding Released Scripts and Themes
,
#1

An add-on for Blender that allows you to view built-in icons and copy their names to the clipboard.

You can enable the add-on in User Preferences - Add-ons - Development - Icon Viewer.

Popup

Spacebar » Icon Viewer
Text Editor » Icon Viewer
Python Console » Icon Viewer

https://wiki.blender.org/uploads/8/8b/Iv1.3.0_popup_640.png

Panel

Text Editor » Icon Viewer

https://wiki.blender.org/uploads/5/53/Iv1.3.0_panel_640.png

1 Like
#2
  • Added icon selection history
  • Added an option to auto focus ‘filter’ input field
#3

Good Stuff!

#4
  • Added an option to close popup on mouse click
  • Added an option to display icons inside panel

https://wiki.blender.org/uploads/5/53/Iv1.3.0_panel_640.png

#5

Just noticed I never thanked you for this addon. Its very useful. thanks.

#6

looks great, we should replace the current icons addon with this one.
thanks :slight_smile:

#7

can you integrate new icons? or can you just use the ones shown?

#8

The add-on shows only built-in icons.
But you can use custom icons in your add-on.

#9

How can i get the files them self, i want to edit on and use that for custom addon?

#10

Link to svg file. You can convert it to png image using Inkscape or some online tool.

#11

okay cool! many thanks!!!

#12

This sounds great! Where can I get it? I see no links :frowning:

#13

The add-on should be installed by default. You can activate it in User Preferences - Add-ons - Development - Icon Viewer.

#14

Fantastic! I had no idea! Thank you so much.

#15

thank you so much

#16

Hi @roaoao

Could you please add toolbar icons?
I don’t find them in your Icon Viewer. :frowning:

Thank you.

#17

Hi @xan2622,
Looks doable. Will try to add them.

1 Like
#18

@roaoao
Hi,
is it me or in 2.91 there is no more “Icon Viewer” button in “Python Console” window?
Here is in 2.90

IV_2.90
IV_2.90890×363 21.9 KB

1 Like
#19

Maybe you have to make it active in prefs

#20

I just ran fresh 2.91 and it asked to load 2.90 settings and I did.
So it should be exactly the same as in 2.90, but not …