Hope this helps someone or many. For those of you interested in using this book, please read the further posts and take Social’s advice. That would be good start for learning BGE Python.
Sorry that it was posted in wrong forum. Please move.
I use Java alot and learning Python came natural. I have just seen alot of questions from those that are new to Python and noticed the trend in younger users.
Although, I do have a suggestion for those who plan to use this book as a “stepping stone” for BGE Python: when you reach the pygame section, it’s time to start working with the BGE.
Actually, you would probably benefit the most if you tried to recreate the games they make with pygame using the BGE.
Can you provide definitive proof that this is truly a rip?
Note: The table of contents, and even the gametypes covered can be similar, or even the same, but if the actual content (writing/images/bullet points) is different, then this does not qualify as ripping.
The only problem is that the douchebag’s is probably more up to date:(
So why would I want to spend $15 on outdated documentation?
If the “professional” wants my hard earned dollars, he should create a new edition, and then I’ll consider it.
Can you provide definitive proof that this is truly a rip?
No, It’s not a direct rip, but yes, the table of contents are very alike and the games you learn are the same except of course re-written or changed a little,
kudos to him for spending enough time to re-word/write everything.
So why would I want to spend $15 on outdated documentation?
You wouldn’t and neither would most people.
But, I think most anyone can re-write a book and that doesn’t give me confidence that he actually knows what he’s talking about.