Measured on the majority of computer users, “all” would be the coverage of windows.
But that would be too easy.
Counterquestion, what can you do with a MacOS what Windows can´t? Besides using proprietary stuff like e.g. FinalCut?
… I feel your opinion is quite biased.
Sure as hell is. Your´s isnt?
I feel an opinion is always biased, else it is conditioned and all would be uniform, and this kind of stuff is called dictatorship, then again, it would be biased too, just everything would have the same orientation. =) scnr
I am actually torn between the worlds, I worked in the game buisiness, now for a film studio, but i am originally a design draftsman and studying computer sciences along the path - so neither an artist nor an engineer, torn, yet i´d stand in the row of the pragmatists - but I never came across any task that required a Mac, nor would it have made my tasks easier - just my bank account more empty.
It´s no matter of hating Mac from my side. Just a matter of not understanding or seeing any advantages - unless it is a PPC.
Besides I dislike Apple for its company policy more and more lately, they pull quite a few stunts and soon will turn out to be more evil than M$ in the 90’s 
maybe os x is a modified linux - so what?
[cut list of advantages]
90% of the stuff isn´t an issue if you know your windows as for the rest.
Why do i need a mac and macos, when any x86 box with linux does exactly the same trick.
In the end the difference is the UI.
the mac hardware doesn’t lose that much money.
I think that is not a valid argument in any way. as a Mac usually stays within Mac users.
You know, it feels like the Appleists (i call them that way because i got no better word) made up the worth, and the hardware gets passed down to another Appleist.
I´ve never heared an x86 box user say :" Hell, now I buy a used mac for more money than a faster new machine would cost, because for sure the hardware will holds its value"
My macbook fall down two times without out damage to the display or cracks.
just the casing is damaged now with some dents. I saw plastic casings scatter.
Lucky you, sending it in would have ended in an odyssey =)
However, with a Thinkpad you can as well hammer in a nail, nothing fancy there, cheap stuff is cheap, a Thinkpad for instance is pricey, still cheaper than a macbook, yet it got more power.
what car do you drive?
opel astra 1.6 =)
why? low fuel usage, powerful enough, lots of room, could afford it. And I bought it used. No matter what car it is, it looses too much value in the first 2 years…
Unless you buy a Maserati, Maibach or something like that - then again, when you buy such a car, you don´t buy it because “it will hold its value”… thats the stuff you tell your wife to justify paying a ridiculous amount of money for a car… that drives… and keeps you dry… and transports stuff… well I doubt there´s a Maibach Station Wagon or a Maserati with trailer coupling… but I think you get it =)
Actually thats a nice anachronism…
(My Opel) : (Maybach car body with my Opels chassis) = (X86 Box) : (Nowadays Mac)
Why anyone buys what, is anyones choice.
Only because maybe PC x has a bigger display etc doesn’t mean that the quality of the display
is as good, or the hardware platform works as well and time.
And you think Apple knits their panels from some magic stuff the others dont have?
There are not many panel manufacturers in this world, and you get them in all qualities, granted, but its not about the panels.
Simply speaking in terms of equal power, the Mac looses in the price-performance ratio.
I´ll actually do some research on the parts used in a Mac once in a while i am intrested now, what manufacturers they use to be more specific on that one… I am a litte unarmed carrying the discussion into that direction =)
Man, I love this thread already, for the sake of the discussion, just to point that out, I am aware that neither mine nor your point of view will change anytime soon, nor am I trying to change yours… Wanted to clarify that, because people often get personally offended in such threads.