Why does this model titled “teen girl” have fully sculpted, highly detailed genitalia, when the detail level on the rest of the body is minimal at best? The sculptor couldn’t handle collarbones or knees but somehow they could do a photorealistic vulva? I know that’s not relevant, but it weirds me out
EDIT: someone liked this post, so I saw this topic (and the accompanying images again), and it’s honestly even creepier than I said at first.
This model has no scapula, collarbones, knees, elbows, foot arches, or cheekbones. The edge flow is mediocre, the facial proportions are amateur to mid-range at best, and everything about this model is low-detail and fairly subpar. Except for the crotch, which has more polygons overall than any other part of the body, and is disturbingly anatomically accurate and sculpted with high detail.
Not to mention the extremely weird implications of this on a “teen girl” model, which has a pre-pubescent facial structure and the general body structure of a not-yet sexually mature adult. This model looks like a 15-year-old, aside from the frankly crude dramatization of the breasts, and there’s no good reason for a 15-year-old “teen girl” model to have highly detailed genitalia. Frankly, there’s no good reason for this model to have any at all. There’s no acceptable legal or ethical context in which these details on this model would be visible.
I’m highly suspicious that this model is intended for use in pornography, and as such, I think this thread should be locked and deleted (@moderators), as per the rules about erotic content: FAQ (Work in Progress) This isn’t artistic nudity, and it’s definitely crossing into sketchy territory when it comes to underage nudity. I don’t think these images or this model should be available on this site