Just a bit of fun with Cycles and texturing. The concept came from a magazine photograph that I saw the other day, I tried to recreate it the best I could - whether I did or not is another thing
Render time on win7 GPU was around 15 minutes (Nvidia GeForce 560 Ti) - 2000 Samples.
A comode? hope you know that is a portable toilet right? Yeah, if I improve it, Iāll add a rubber duck for you juhada
I created the floor myself from a selection of 5 texture planks - mixed them up a bit in an image editor and change the colour slightly etc. I added geomtry to the boards with a slight bevel edge to catch the light. I think the the planks came from CG-Textures.
The light is actually dimly switched on, this is why it appears a bit flat
1. A low cabinet or chest of drawers, often elaborately decorated and usually standing on legs or short feet. 2. a. A movable stand or cupboard containing a washbowl. b. A chair enclosing a chamber pot. c. A toilet.
3. A womanās ornate headdress, fashionable around 1700.
Both of us were right, so now you owe me a rubber duck version of this piece. I still like the render!
Youāll notice that bright Mesh Emitters in scenes suffer from dodgey Anti-alaising, so a bit of post work is required to help tidy them up. I used a Bloom node setup as in the original and just tidied up a bit extra in an image editor as I didnāt want to over do the Bloom.
Zander Nicolic, I would upload a larger image, Iām just not sure what the rules are on resolution and file size on Blender Artists forum.
The Image came from a UK Homeware magazine āElle Decorationā, it was an advertisement for Ercol Barton. If you manage to track the image down, youāll see that the photograph was actually shot in a studio with heavy side diffused lighting, not very realistc - Although I couldnāt match the ambience in Cycles, I think weāre still a long way off to getting such a shot - hopefully little tests like this will get us closer though.
Wow Jay! Respect! I wasnāt actually joking about those ducks, but adding a row of ducks makes this even better than I imagined it could be. My initial point was that your image was so
disciplined in the first version,that i almost wanted to see a bit of āvisual noiseā if you will, just for the sake of contrast: your ultimately clean and perfect setup vs some playful, out of place element. Now that you added a bunch of them this image tells a story. Donāt get me wrong here though, I like your original image just as much as before, but I really like how you went and actually gave the ducks a shot. Raising my hat here! And yes, I like the ducked up version even better! Bravo