A while back I started on a mouse-eye-view animation. Production eventually stopped due to a lack of mouse testimonials… only the humans are talking and they don’t seem to know enough about mouse eyes. One clue found so far is that mice posses bi-chromatic vision [1]. In addition, they may only be sensitive to objects in motion [2]. However, I’m wondering how the small size and differing structure of an eyeball might affect focal length and other visual parameters [3].
Pondering this question leads me to wonder about other evolutions of visual appendages… what does an ant see? Cats and dogs? How about a fly’s compound eyes? If you really want to get tricky, what does a rock or blade of grass see [4]?
* Have you attempted to recreate the visual experience of a non-human?
- What did you use as a reference or inspiration?
- Got a pic to post? Settings? Ideas?
- Could a “Through the eyes of a…” contest thread provide the competitive atmosphere that answers this age old question once and for all [5]?
[1] Lacking sensitivity to red light - could be done in nodes.
[2] Composite setup looking back 4 or 5 frames to achieve this effect?
[3] Simply a narrow angle lens? Blurred, darkened frame edges? No? What else?
[4] Sure, they don’t have eyes. However, if you took the environmental stimulus applied to these objects and somehow mapped it to an optical nerve, what would you get? Just a thought exercise.
[5] And an opportunity for BA to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize!?