Will it be faster to render smoke and fire separately and then composit together or?

Will it be faster to render smoke and fire separately and then composit together or not faster?

I don’t know about speed, but very-frankly I think about control. Specifically, "keeping my options wide-open when I start to composite(!) things together.

“‘Smoke’ is one thing, and ‘Fire’ is another.’”

Furthermore … “what’s the cheapest-and-easiest way to get ‘more smoke,’ or ‘more fire?’” Uh huh, you guessed it: “composite the stuff on top of itself, offset plus-or-minus a few frames.” Cheap, effective, easy … no 3D-rendering required.

Whenever possible, I would advocate that you should focus on one visual effect at a time. Particularly when one (smoke) has to do with the occlusion of light, while the other (fire) has to do with producing it.

Frankly, I would not deal with these two objectives “together,” unless I could convince myself that I had to.