UPDATE! Much simplified with new topology nodes in version 3.4!
Curve-To-Mesh Even-Thickness(3.4)(1).blend (123.6 KB)
Use like normal Curve-To-Mesh:
Without Even-Thickness:
With Even-Thickness :
Took a lot of work, so hope someone finds it useful.
wonderfulā¦ thanks very much.
I did a python code for even-thickness extrude some time ago, Iālll try convert it to geo nodes too.
Thanks
Yeah, youāll see that it works really well for corners over 90deg, but when they go under 90deg they tend to under-scale. Yoursās also appears to do some type of z-up correction which is something I do separately as it isnāt always desired:
no z-up correction:
z-up correction:
Using separate node-group:
Good luck.
yesā¦ has z-up correctionā¦ I have a ābankā option to turn on/off z-up.
Iām using a custom version of the āparallel transport frameā algorithm to place correct profile position, rotation and shear/scale and using extrude (bmesh.ops.bridge_loops).
Please get them to bake your fix into the actual system. The current behaviour is useless for everything Iāve ever tried to use it for.
Hey, Iāve added an update (posted right at the top) to the scale factor and I think Iāve nailed itā¦ would be interested to see another comparison (please use the Z-Up-Curve-Tilt group when comparing tho.).
Oh no, that looks like something went horribly wrong.
Will investigate.
@zeroskilzā¦
If you want my script for try convert it in geonode, I send to youā¦ script not finished, raw scriptā¦ but works.
I dont have time to finish and try convert it in geonodes now.
Thanks. But no needā¦ no way I can do that in 3.0ā¦ I believe I would need the accumulator to implement the travelling-frame algorithm.
Are you using 3.1? Having weird experience were noodles are randomly disconnected in the nodegroups when I open it in 3.0. Hope others arenāt experiencing that. 
Z-Up should look more like this:
Top
Side:
I expected weird twists on the z-axis:
ā¦ the travelling-frame algorithm tilts āminimallyā so if we were to use a circularly asymmetrical profile curve, yoursās isnāt guaranteed to always point up, whereas mine, being simpler, would.
I will provide 3.1 versions of the NodeGroups also in case others are experiencing the weird noodle-disconnect issue. 
Thanks for your help, much appreciated 
yesā¦ using 3.1
Comparison (Blender 3.0).blend (161.7 KB)
So, had to append all the objects to new file to sort out 3.1 weirdness but hopefully this serves as a good demonstrator of the various pros/cons of the various methods (And a good place to get all the node-groups):
It also shows the parity between z-up twist method and the z-up-curve-tilt node-group.
Also shows that the Z-Up-Curve-To-Mesh absolutely hates going āback and upā almost more than it hates just going up. Only the tiny flattish section at the top plays nicely, which re-enforces its limited use-caseā¦ it works better for these types of curves:
Opens OK for me in 3.1 - hope you donāt have any issues.
Thanks.
Shall I slap myself with a fish or with a brick, my lord?
Donno, I now doubt the wisdom of making the thing that the node-group does an optionā¦ its probably a design anti-pattern on my part and Iāll try learn from your experience 
If you find this nodegroup useful you may like to support my bombed curve-sweeper node-group which also does things like UVs and points as profile.
Thanks for your feedback.
cool stuff. any plans on making a replacement for the screw modifier?
Hi there,
I am involved in addressing this issue in Blender for now in Geometry Nodes Curve-to-Mesh node only as of v3.5). This is still in development but closing in on a solution and thatād be great if you could provide some feedback here: Blender Devtalk / Curve to Mesh - Even Thickness
Thanks in advance!
