Hi all, the new benchmark Cycles.
It is GPU only.
Benchmark use now 256x256 tiles.
It is a compromise between rendertime and keep 3 or more GPU busy.
Please don´t upload images, render time and specs only, as stamped.
Please use official Blender 2.73 only, we can compare performance better if all use the same Blender version.
I add the 2.72 file here too, please render both files with 2.73.
Open files, hit F12, write down:
Be aware of long rendertime on low end GPU´s, my GTX 760 need 16 Minutes!
It should be possible to render the bench on 1 GB GPU.
OS
GPU Rendertime:
Sponza: XX:XX.XX as stamped. 2.72 file: XX:XX.XX as stamped.
Original file and textures from Marko Dabrovic (Lightwave).
Adapted for Cycles from Pixal (Greg Zaal), many thanks. http://portfolio.gregzaal.com/
I change some settings, reduce texture size for benchmarking.
I remember Sponza, I group I used years ago for 3dsmax used it as a benchmark back then, late 90’s I think it was. Good chice mib. Anyway the results :-
OS : Win 64
GPU : 2 x GTX 780 ti SC
Time : 04:04.15
** EDIT
Sorry, scrub the last results, I had “Auto Tile Size” enabled.I set it to 256x256 and got these results :-
OS : Win 64
GPU : 2 x GTX 780 ti SC
Time : 04:06.77
Interesting that the Fermi card is beating the 760 in this one. I have 2 580’s doing nothing. Might drop them back in my spare machine jus for comparison.
Mib2berlin why not optimize tile size to fit evenly with the dimensions size? Like in previous benchmarks. It is noticeably faster as you can see above.
Hey, thanks for posting.
These are interesting results, it seams the 900 and the 500 cards are profit from the scene or latest Cuda development.
There are not much entries atm. but I post the first results.
@LordOdin, Your result is a bit annoying, as fast as 780+TITAN, or the 700 series lost a lot of performance. @eklein, tile setting was discussed a lot in the last benchmark thread.
Absolute result is not important, we only want compare the GPU´s.
