The SDF Prototyper add-on has been released, and this is updated in the SDF modeling in Blender section, including a new video.
ＳＤＦ ｉｎｆｏ
SDF stands for Signed Distance Fields, and is emerging as a flexible and powerful 3D modeling method. SDF floats in the realm of CSG 3D (Constructive Solid Geometry), and is sometimes also referred to as FRep. Traditionally, CSG is NURBS-based, which means you still need to take restrictive underlying surface structures into account, with the risk of failing Booleans, fillets, chamfers, et cetera. But SDF is based on volumetric math functions, usually rendered as 3D volumes in shader space using ray-marching.
SDF volumes can optionally be meshed (usually with vertex colors) using a volumetric grid projection algorithm such as OpenVDB, to make the result usable in polygon-based 3D editors like Blender.
Advantages of SDF compared to NURBS and polygons
No worries about topology / mesh structure.
Real-time and non-destructive blending of shapes and colors.
Real-time, non-destructive and never-failing Booleans, blends, fillets, chamfers, shells, insets and outsets.
Some techniques require relatively little extra computation, such as arrays and lots of instances.
Disadvantages of SDF compared to NURBS and polygons
Not very suitable for highly detailed single-part objects, because of the high grid resolution needed for that.
Not very suitable for objects featuring lots of thin, elongated parts with different angles, such as a radio tower, also because of the grid method limitations.
Here’s a nice explainer video about SDF tech:
ＳＤＦ ｍｏｄｅｌｉｎｇ ｉｎ Ｂｌｅｎｄｅｒ
Blob Fusion add-on (Works in Blender 4.x and in Blender for macOS)
ConjureSDF add-on (Does not yet work in Blender 4.x or Blender for macOS)
MagicaCSG is a fast, versatile and user-friendly SDF-based 3D modeler and renderer for Windows, by the developer of MagicaVoxel…
MagicaCSG info and download page Windows only. There’s a free demo version with limited functionality. Become a Patreon supporter to get access to the full-featured versions, and support MagicaCSG development.
If you think something is missing or incorrect here, or if you discover a broken link, please let me know in a reply to this thread, and I’ll add or fix it. Thanks in advance.
Very interesting! It looks like metaballs but it is much more precise in preserving the shapes. Some further refinement and it can be an excellent tool for modelling.
This is interesting. What is this technique about? How does this compare to the sculpting we have now in Blender? Does it give better performance? What about sculpting small and medium or even micro details? Or is this in the conceptual stage like when using dynotopo, voxel remesher?
I also saw a vid of sdf used for texturing using very low res textures. Thats actually cool.
Signed Distance Fields is a volumetric technique, similar to voxels and point clouds. Cinema 4D already includes it for a number of years, but their implementation starts to slow down as soon as a scene becomes a little complex.
This new editor looks very promising. Looking at the brilliance of the MagicaVoxel editor from the same developer, I’ve got high expectations of this new SDF editor. Love the speed and versatility of the implementation, including the automatic adoption of the material from an added or subtracted shape.
Looks like a nice toolset. Some of the work I’ve seen with his MagicaVoxel is quite brilliant. I’ve been having a lot of fun doing hard-surface in VR in Medium lately. I never really used voxels before in my workflow, but I would love to see SDF tech in Medium. Hard-Surface concepting/sketching in Medium(and voxels in general, with the right tools) has huge potential.
I hope the new SDF editor (and a possible implementation in Medium and/or Blender) will also be useful for organic modeling. It should at least be useful for basemeshes, and cartoony / toy character models.
The old silhouette brush google summer of code project had a similar concept. The volumes it created weren’t as clean though. The student didn’t manage to complete it:
I guess Blender sculpt will have to get sort of ballon like quick bloc kout feature.
Let’s stay on track with signed distance field modeling
Modeling with primitive and signe distance fields matters if you can use that in 3D real time engine like PS4 game Dreams for example.
Otherwise for sculpting only why not using simple Voxels with sculpting tools instead ?
More powerfull and unlimited, no primitives constraint.
So voxels better than signed distance field, what advantage about using primitives only with signed distance field ?
When you can’t use that primitives modeling in a game engine like Clayxels or PS4 Dreams ?
I guess modeling with primitives and signed distance fields is perhaps faster block out, while allowing details, and lot more friendly for non modeler users and new comers to modeling.
Interesting, but in the end it will still be internally converted to polygons, or not? Like NURBS: infinitely smooth surfaces, but they need to be meshed, and quad-polygons still exist of triangles underneath the surface.
In this case rather not, and generally the answer may often be also no, there exist different rendering approaches for datastructures or surfacedescriptions, having the nurbs definition and deciding how you render them could be done in different ways. Dreams is utilizing pointclouds and point cloud rendering may again fall back to rendering polygons, but that is not the case here as far as I know. Its just a multistepped pure point cloud rendering. Including subclouds for parts near to the camera. Generally, there very well different rendering approaches possible, that don’t really rely on triangles for rendering, metaballs for example should not get confused with blenders metaball meshes, they can be completely rendered without utilizing triangles.
Updated: November 3, 2024.
Recent changes…
ＳＤＦ ｉｎｆｏ
ＳＤＦ ｍｏｄｅｌｉｎｇ ｉｎ Ｂｌｅｎｄｅｒ
SDF Prototyper video
ＭａｇｉｃａＣＳＧ
Ｏｔｈｅｒ ＳＤＦ ｍｏｄｅｌｉｎｇ ｔｏｏｌｓ
Ｔｅｃｈｎｉｃａｌ ｒｅｆｅｒｅｎｃｅ
